Thursday, September 30, 2010
Thursday, September 23, 2010
St. Vukasin of Klepci and Jasenovac
Wednesday, September 08, 2010
Thursday, September 02, 2010
Saturday, August 21, 2010
9/11 Crock
St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church, destroyed in the 9/11 attack, will not be rebuilt.
Thanks to Fr. John Whiteford
Thanks to Fr. John Whiteford
Friday, August 20, 2010
Promising Blog
I'd like to commend to your attention a blog that's captured my attention. Fr. Oliver and I don't agree on all issues, but his disagreements are for the right reasons. I look forward to more stimulating conversations there.
Buy From Target
Target donated to a political candidate who happened to oppose gay marriage. The donation wasn't directed toward the gay marriage issue, though. Gay marriage supporters, with characteristic tunnel vision, are upset at Target.
I like Target, and I'll continue to shop there.
By the way, I'm fine with corporate political contributions without quantitative limitations, and even without "full disclosure".
I like Target, and I'll continue to shop there.
By the way, I'm fine with corporate political contributions without quantitative limitations, and even without "full disclosure".
Sunday, August 15, 2010
Blessings From Prosaic Materials
I've been given recently a rather ordinary-looking magnetic icon of St. George. We've all seen them. It's small enough to fit into a shirt pocket. What makes this one different, however, is that it's been blessed by the relics of SS Herman of Alaska, Tikhon of Moscow, and Alexis of Zosima.
Happy Dormition!
Monday, July 26, 2010
Happy Fasting!
Beginning tomorrow, I won't be posting or commenting until the Dormition.
A kad postite, ne budite žalosni kao licemeri; jer oni naèine bleda lica svoja da ih vide ljudi gde poste. Zaista vam kažem da su primili platu svoju.
Moreover when ye fast, be not, as the hypocrites, of a sad countenance: for they disfigure their faces, that they may appear unto men to fast. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.
Matthew 6:16
A kad postite, ne budite žalosni kao licemeri; jer oni naèine bleda lica svoja da ih vide ljudi gde poste. Zaista vam kažem da su primili platu svoju.
Moreover when ye fast, be not, as the hypocrites, of a sad countenance: for they disfigure their faces, that they may appear unto men to fast. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.
Matthew 6:16
Saturday, July 24, 2010
Vlad III, Romanian Hero
Westerners view him negatively, but he's viewed favorably in the East across ecumenical lines.
Thursday, July 15, 2010
When You're In Henderson, Nevada
During a discussion over at John's place, I discovered that our own Sophocles is co-owner, and soon to be a larger owner, of Kyklos Greek Cafe in Henderson, Nevada. The fact that Sophocles has access to enough lending--in one of the worst-hit housing markets--to enlarge his ownership stake demonstrates his business acumen. I'd call it extreme acumen.
I'm pleased to call attention to the Kyklos link that I'm placing in the appropriate spot on the right.
Sophocles can tell you what he does in his own words:
I'm pleased to call attention to the Kyklos link that I'm placing in the appropriate spot on the right.
Sophocles can tell you what he does in his own words:
Monday, July 12, 2010
Sunday, July 11, 2010
Saturday, July 10, 2010
Thursday, July 08, 2010
Rand And Rights
Individual rights are not subject to a public vote; a majority has no right to vote away the rights of a minority; the political function of rights is precisely to protect minorities from oppression by majorities (and the smallest minority on earth is the individual).
Ayn Rand
Wednesday, July 07, 2010
Clergy Don't Like Begging For Money
The Church should have its own stable source of income and this income can't be based only on parishioners' donations. The Church can't exist only on money received from selling candles, icons or church literature.
Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk
Property, prior to its nationalization and theft, provided the Church's income, he believes.
Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk
Property, prior to its nationalization and theft, provided the Church's income, he believes.
Finally, Good News From Russia
At Vladimir Putin's instruction, Russia will donate $2 million toward restoring Orthodox shrines in Kosovo.
Deadly Symfonia
Colonel Alexander Kozin serves in the Federal Security Service on week days, while on weekends he celebrates Divine liturgies in the garrison Church of the Iveron Icon of the Mother of God on the Fields as besides having a military rank, he carries out a priestly ministry.
Russia's Federal Security Service is the successor organization to the infamous KGB.
Maybe Met. Laurus jumped the gun on reunification.
Father, would you bless my martyr's icon before you interrogate me?
Russia's Federal Security Service is the successor organization to the infamous KGB.
Maybe Met. Laurus jumped the gun on reunification.
Father, would you bless my martyr's icon before you interrogate me?
A Strong Hand Is Needed
'The whole human history shows that nations with clear mission and clear goals, which knew exactly why they live and work, were most successful,' head of the Synodal Department for Church and Society Relations Archpriest Vsevolod Chaplin said speaking on Thursday in Moscow Forum National Project – Russia.
National missions and goals don't emerge spontaneously from a free people. They emerge from tyrants. Fr. Vsevolod, you ain't foolin' me.
National missions and goals don't emerge spontaneously from a free people. They emerge from tyrants. Fr. Vsevolod, you ain't foolin' me.
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
The Others Were Chopped Liver
The protectionist US government has approved only a few foreign skimmers for Gulf duty. Maybe size does matter.
Monday, June 21, 2010
Thursday, June 17, 2010
"St. Nikolai Velimirovic on the world economic crisis (this is from the 1929 letter to priest K.)"
You are asking me, man of God, about the reason and meaning of the present crisis. Who am I that you ask me about this great mystery? "Speak if you have something greater than silence," said St. Gregory the Theologian. And although I find that presently silence is higher than any word, I will, out of love for you, write what I think about this question.
"Crisis" is a Greek word, and in translation it means "judgment". In the Holy Scripture the word "judgment" is used many times. We read in the Psalms, Therefore the ungodly shall not stand in the judgment (Ps. 1:5). Later again, I will sing of mercy and judgment: unto thee, O LORD, will I sing. (Ps. 101:1). The wise king Solomon writes that the judgment will come to everyone from the Lord (Proverbs 29:26). The Savior himself said, "For the Father judges no man, but has committed all judgment unto the Son." (John 5:22). Apostol Peter writes, "For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God" (1 Pet. 4:17).
Replace the word "judgment" with the word "crisis" and read, "I will sing of mercy and crisis", "Crisis will come to everyone from the Lord", "The Father committed all crisis unto the Son", "For the time is come that crisis must begin at the house of God".
Previously the Europeans, when some trouble befell them, used the word "judgment" instead of the word "crisis". These days the word "judgment" is replaced with the word "crisis", a clear word with one less clear. The drought would come, people would say, "God's judgment!", flood - "God's judgment!". A war or epidemic would start, "God's judgment!", earthquakes, locust, other trials, always the same - "God's judgment!" Therefore, crisis is because of the drought, because of the flood, of the wars and epidemics. And people see the present financial, economic catastrophe as God's judgment, but they call it "crisis" rather than "judgment". So that the trouble would increase from lack of reason! Because when the clear word "judgment" was said, the reason that led to the trouble was clear, and the Judge who allowed the trouble was known, and so was the purpose for which the trouble was allowed. But after replacing the word "judgment" with the word "crisis", which is unclear for the most, no one can explain why it is, from whom, and for what. And this is the only thing in which this crisis differs from the crisis that happens from drought and flood, war or epidemic, locust or other tribulation.
You are asking about the reason of today's crisis, or God's judgment? The reason is always the same. The reason for all droughts, floods, epidemics and other troubles is the same as of today's crisis - the falling away from God. The sin of falling away from God has resulted in this crisis as well, and the Lord allowed it so as to wake people, sober them, so that they would repent and come back to him. The crisis is commensurate to sins. And truly, the Lord used modern means to teach modern people: he struck the banks, the stock exchanges, the entire financial system. He overturned the tables of money-lenders just as he once did in the temple in Jerusalem. He created an unprecedented panic between merchants and money-lenders. Stirred up, brought down, mixed up, confused, bestowed fear. And all that so that proud European and American wise men would wake up, repent, remember God. So that they who are anchored in the haven of material comfort would remember their souls, acknowledge their trespassings and bow down before God the Highest, the living God.
How long will the crisis last? Until the proud culprits acknowledge the victory of the All-Powerful. Until the people would realize that they have to translate the unclear word "crisis" into their native language and would exclaim with the repentant sigh, "God's judgment!"
Therefore you, honest Father, should also call "crisis" "God's judgment", and you will understand everything.
Greetings to you and Lord's peace!
"Crisis" is a Greek word, and in translation it means "judgment". In the Holy Scripture the word "judgment" is used many times. We read in the Psalms, Therefore the ungodly shall not stand in the judgment (Ps. 1:5). Later again, I will sing of mercy and judgment: unto thee, O LORD, will I sing. (Ps. 101:1). The wise king Solomon writes that the judgment will come to everyone from the Lord (Proverbs 29:26). The Savior himself said, "For the Father judges no man, but has committed all judgment unto the Son." (John 5:22). Apostol Peter writes, "For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God" (1 Pet. 4:17).
Replace the word "judgment" with the word "crisis" and read, "I will sing of mercy and crisis", "Crisis will come to everyone from the Lord", "The Father committed all crisis unto the Son", "For the time is come that crisis must begin at the house of God".
Previously the Europeans, when some trouble befell them, used the word "judgment" instead of the word "crisis". These days the word "judgment" is replaced with the word "crisis", a clear word with one less clear. The drought would come, people would say, "God's judgment!", flood - "God's judgment!". A war or epidemic would start, "God's judgment!", earthquakes, locust, other trials, always the same - "God's judgment!" Therefore, crisis is because of the drought, because of the flood, of the wars and epidemics. And people see the present financial, economic catastrophe as God's judgment, but they call it "crisis" rather than "judgment". So that the trouble would increase from lack of reason! Because when the clear word "judgment" was said, the reason that led to the trouble was clear, and the Judge who allowed the trouble was known, and so was the purpose for which the trouble was allowed. But after replacing the word "judgment" with the word "crisis", which is unclear for the most, no one can explain why it is, from whom, and for what. And this is the only thing in which this crisis differs from the crisis that happens from drought and flood, war or epidemic, locust or other tribulation.
You are asking about the reason of today's crisis, or God's judgment? The reason is always the same. The reason for all droughts, floods, epidemics and other troubles is the same as of today's crisis - the falling away from God. The sin of falling away from God has resulted in this crisis as well, and the Lord allowed it so as to wake people, sober them, so that they would repent and come back to him. The crisis is commensurate to sins. And truly, the Lord used modern means to teach modern people: he struck the banks, the stock exchanges, the entire financial system. He overturned the tables of money-lenders just as he once did in the temple in Jerusalem. He created an unprecedented panic between merchants and money-lenders. Stirred up, brought down, mixed up, confused, bestowed fear. And all that so that proud European and American wise men would wake up, repent, remember God. So that they who are anchored in the haven of material comfort would remember their souls, acknowledge their trespassings and bow down before God the Highest, the living God.
How long will the crisis last? Until the proud culprits acknowledge the victory of the All-Powerful. Until the people would realize that they have to translate the unclear word "crisis" into their native language and would exclaim with the repentant sigh, "God's judgment!"
Therefore you, honest Father, should also call "crisis" "God's judgment", and you will understand everything.
Greetings to you and Lord's peace!
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
Funny, I Never Thought Of That
Everybody's an artist. Everybody's God. It's just that they're inhibited.
Yoko Ono
Yoko Ono
Alternative View
The abstraction called the "ecosystem" – which never seems to include humans or their civilization – has done far less for us than the oil industry.
Lew Rockwell, Why Not Feel Sorry For BP?
Lew Rockwell, Why Not Feel Sorry For BP?
Friday, June 11, 2010
Monday, June 07, 2010
Any Questions?
St. Macarius of Alexandria once asked the angels who escorted him in the desert, “When the fathers were told to make offerings for the reposed in the church on the third, ninth, and fortieth day, what good does it do to the soul of the departed?” An angel answered, “God did not allow anything to be in the Church which is not good and useful; rather, He established heavenly and earthly Sacraments in His Church and commanded to do them.” (qtd. in St. Feofan)
Fr. Sergei Sveshnikov, On the Significance of the Ritual of the Russian Orthodox Church Surrounding Death and Dying for the Grieving Process of the Bereaved
Fr. Sergei Sveshnikov, On the Significance of the Ritual of the Russian Orthodox Church Surrounding Death and Dying for the Grieving Process of the Bereaved
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Timely View, Second Helping
I like this interview so much that I've decided to post another excerpt:
The Vatican does not take steps thoughtlessly nor naively. Every tour of each Pope has as its aim to present him as the worldwide leader of Christianity. At this point, however, he is neither a canonical Bishop, nor Orthodox, such that he is in no place to present himself as having the first place among bishops.
Met. Athanasios of Lemesou
The Vatican does not take steps thoughtlessly nor naively. Every tour of each Pope has as its aim to present him as the worldwide leader of Christianity. At this point, however, he is neither a canonical Bishop, nor Orthodox, such that he is in no place to present himself as having the first place among bishops.
Met. Athanasios of Lemesou
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
Timely View
He [the Pope] has been outside of the Church for ten centuries now, he is not a canonical bishop, he has no relation whatsoever to the reality of the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church of Christ. It is one thing to receive him as a canonical bishop and quite another to speak to him as [being] a heterodox in order to reveal to him the truth of the Orthodox Faith and Tradition.
Met. Athanasios of Lemesou
The Patriarch's Prize In Cinema
Fitting recognition for the best examples of Orthodox cinema.
According to Alexiy II’s personal observations, there are more and more films in Russia 'that contain a call for spiritual perfection and that give examples of highly moral behavior'.
According to Alexiy II’s personal observations, there are more and more films in Russia 'that contain a call for spiritual perfection and that give examples of highly moral behavior'.
Milking Sovereign Immunity
As a secular ruler, Old Rome's Vicar of Christ is immune from questioning and prosecution in civil matters.
Saturday, May 22, 2010
Friday, May 21, 2010
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
Mille Regretz
One of the few Kyries that I like is composed by Cristobal de Morales in his Missa Mille Regretz:
This is probably the right speed, but I innately prefer a snappier tempo:
This Mass setting was based on Josquin des Pres' secular chanson, Mille Regretz:
Basing Mass settings on secular songs was a Protestant complaint during the Reformation.
This is probably the right speed, but I innately prefer a snappier tempo:
This Mass setting was based on Josquin des Pres' secular chanson, Mille Regretz:
Basing Mass settings on secular songs was a Protestant complaint during the Reformation.
Another Commendable Palestrina Motet and Gloria
The Motet and Gloria are from Palestrina's Missa Hodie Christus Natus Est.
They're being conducted a little slower than I'd prefer.
Ecumenist Tidbits
I'm convinced that, if God has a hand in the unfolding of daily events, He has a sense of humor. Consider the following:
1. A woman told me that her husband is trying to convince her to switch from the Roman Rite to the Unia. She'd like me to answer his questions about "Eastern" stuff.
2. Another RC woman, who's currently teaching a class for prospective First Communicants, asked me to explain transubstantiation to her, which I managed to do without singing Tantum Ergo. She then invited me to be a guest lecturer at her class. Envisioning a lecture entitled, "Broad Path v. Narrow Path", I advised her to ask her padre first. I haven't heard back, thank goodness.
1. A woman told me that her husband is trying to convince her to switch from the Roman Rite to the Unia. She'd like me to answer his questions about "Eastern" stuff.
2. Another RC woman, who's currently teaching a class for prospective First Communicants, asked me to explain transubstantiation to her, which I managed to do without singing Tantum Ergo. She then invited me to be a guest lecturer at her class. Envisioning a lecture entitled, "Broad Path v. Narrow Path", I advised her to ask her padre first. I haven't heard back, thank goodness.
Thursday, April 29, 2010
Something Different
Palestrina's Missa Papae Marcelli saved polyphony from Trent's whip, or so the rumor goes. It's my favorite sing-along for the Ordinaries sine filioque, and I sing all parts (not simultaneously). I've included here only the Gloria.
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
No Rollovers, Please
Thank goodness that Goldman Sachs didn't roll over for the sanctimonious senatorial mediocrities.
In view of my aversion to writing anything longer than one sentence, I'll just let you read a couple of things with which I agree on this issue:
Peter Schiff's take on the issue.
Holman Jenkins' take on the issue.
As I've mentioned before, Jenkins is the smartest columnist at the WSJ.
In view of my aversion to writing anything longer than one sentence, I'll just let you read a couple of things with which I agree on this issue:
Peter Schiff's take on the issue.
Holman Jenkins' take on the issue.
As I've mentioned before, Jenkins is the smartest columnist at the WSJ.
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
Deja Vu?
Monday, April 05, 2010
Sunday, March 28, 2010
"As Many As Have Been Baptized Into Christ"
This morning we sang this hymn for Christ's triumphal entry into Jerusalem after his raising of Lazarus.
For some of us, however, this hymn holds an additional, slightly different meaning. Father Nektarios has this account of Orthodox persecution during World War II:
Bishop Sava (Trlaich) of Plalski (Lika) was imprisoned on June 13, 1941 and tortured beyond endurance in a stable along with several priests. During their beatings a phonograph recording of "As many as have been baptized into Christ, have put on Christ" was played. The bishop-confessor was permitted to say good-bye to his 83-year-old mother, albeit with his hands tied and his feet shackled. In mid-August of the same year he was taken to the Velebit Mountain and thrown into a pit with numerous other Serbs.
For some of us, however, this hymn holds an additional, slightly different meaning. Father Nektarios has this account of Orthodox persecution during World War II:
Bishop Sava (Trlaich) of Plalski (Lika) was imprisoned on June 13, 1941 and tortured beyond endurance in a stable along with several priests. During their beatings a phonograph recording of "As many as have been baptized into Christ, have put on Christ" was played. The bishop-confessor was permitted to say good-bye to his 83-year-old mother, albeit with his hands tied and his feet shackled. In mid-August of the same year he was taken to the Velebit Mountain and thrown into a pit with numerous other Serbs.
2nd Healthcare Discussion In The Nave
My physician friend told me that when he started his career, people who couldn't pay him his fee gave him chickens and produce for his services. Nowadays, people who can't afford him pay him nothing, offer him nothing, and don't thank him.
Saturday, March 27, 2010
When Even Pierogi Aren't Sacred
Things are getting really bad when someone robs a pirohi sale. The good news is that donors made up for the loss.
I should give them a call. The old folks talk fondly about prune piroghi as a Lenten treat.
I should give them a call. The old folks talk fondly about prune piroghi as a Lenten treat.
Blue Laws--Why Not?
One county in New Jersey doesn't permit commerce on Sundays:
The blue laws have been in effect in Bergen County since the 1950s to give our citizens ... one day of rest from the traffic jams, noise pollution and accidents that are a nightmare on Saturdays and long weekends...
Six days give people plenty of time to be worker bees. Clergy are exempt.
The blue laws have been in effect in Bergen County since the 1950s to give our citizens ... one day of rest from the traffic jams, noise pollution and accidents that are a nightmare on Saturdays and long weekends...
Six days give people plenty of time to be worker bees. Clergy are exempt.
Healthcare Discussion In The Nave
I asked a physician friend how he liked being forced to become an Unmercenary.
He didn't.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. --Thomas Jefferson
He didn't.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. --Thomas Jefferson
Friday, March 19, 2010
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Sunday, March 14, 2010
Saturday, March 13, 2010
"Neither Your Dreams Nor Your Strictures Can Eradicate Them"
I happened upon one of Och's postings about some jurisdictional controversy, and, once again, he's pronounced certain occupations unfit for Christians. In this instance, he mentioned bill collector, napalm manufacturer, and Monsanto attorney. He's mentioned others in the past, but I've been an irregular reader of his recent posts, and therefore I've probably missed a wheelbarrow full.
I posted this comment just to let him know that his promotion of an agrarian dystopia hasn't gone unnoticed:
Out of all of the other occupations you've dissed over time one appears to be conspicuously absent: agricultural utopian.
By fostering agriculture, which is pretty easy to understand economically as a form of production across time periods, you're promoting the emergence and maintenance of moneylending. God knows that you don't like moneylending. Moneylending can't survive if production takes place over a short period of time.
I'm sure you don't intend to be a hypocrite, but your failure to study economics lands you in such straits.
To be a consistent Ochlophobist, you'd promote hunting and gathering as the archtype of Christian secular occupations.
Consider the lilies, how they grow; they neither toil nor spin; yet I tell you, even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. (Luke 12:6 RSV)
God gave us economic laws so that we can get by in a fallen world. Neither your dreams nor strictures can eradicate them.
I posted this comment just to let him know that his promotion of an agrarian dystopia hasn't gone unnoticed:
Out of all of the other occupations you've dissed over time one appears to be conspicuously absent: agricultural utopian.
By fostering agriculture, which is pretty easy to understand economically as a form of production across time periods, you're promoting the emergence and maintenance of moneylending. God knows that you don't like moneylending. Moneylending can't survive if production takes place over a short period of time.
I'm sure you don't intend to be a hypocrite, but your failure to study economics lands you in such straits.
To be a consistent Ochlophobist, you'd promote hunting and gathering as the archtype of Christian secular occupations.
Consider the lilies, how they grow; they neither toil nor spin; yet I tell you, even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. (Luke 12:6 RSV)
God gave us economic laws so that we can get by in a fallen world. Neither your dreams nor strictures can eradicate them.
Friday, March 12, 2010
My Vehicle Has A Clutch
and I know all about shifting into neutral.
Runaway Prius
By all means, let's let the government shift for us.
Runaway Prius
By all means, let's let the government shift for us.
Thursday, March 11, 2010
"Do not attend non-Orthodox services – there is no substitute for Orthodox worship or Orthodox sacraments! "
Wise words from the clergy who serve our Orthodox warriors.
Thursday, March 04, 2010
Wertfreiheit, Again
Gabriel and I have been discussing the relationship between Austrian economics and libertarianism. Maybe this piece by Ralph Raico will add to the discussion.
Wednesday, March 03, 2010
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
The Irrelevant Un-Maestro
There he goes again. Alan Greenspan sees little economic light as the recovery remains "unbalanced", with only high earners and big companies driving growth so far.
The reasons for Alan's pessimism are my reasons for optimism. Concentration of capital, such as those in the hands of high earners and big corporations, are what sets in motion a solid recovery. Small businesses can't borrow unless capital is available. The unemployed can't get jobs until capital is amassed and used to purchase productive capacity. Production must precede consumption.
This truth is the reason why the Gospel's admonition to aid the poor cannot constitute the basis for sound economic policy. Dispersion of capital--dissaving--is what wrecks economic recoveries. One aids the poor from one's surplus, not from one's seed corn.
The decision about how much to save and how much to consume--and how much to give to the poor--is a decision best made by each believer, not by the State.
The reasons for Alan's pessimism are my reasons for optimism. Concentration of capital, such as those in the hands of high earners and big corporations, are what sets in motion a solid recovery. Small businesses can't borrow unless capital is available. The unemployed can't get jobs until capital is amassed and used to purchase productive capacity. Production must precede consumption.
This truth is the reason why the Gospel's admonition to aid the poor cannot constitute the basis for sound economic policy. Dispersion of capital--dissaving--is what wrecks economic recoveries. One aids the poor from one's surplus, not from one's seed corn.
The decision about how much to save and how much to consume--and how much to give to the poor--is a decision best made by each believer, not by the State.
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Why Bother With Getting Up?
Our minds become more sluggish the longer we're awake.
Come to think of it, I rather like this study. Nighty night.
Come to think of it, I rather like this study. Nighty night.
Saturday, February 20, 2010
Whiff Of Pew-Stink
A More Mundane Criterion
Another interesting item from Och's blog concerns the report that the OCA's Met Jonah is talking to the Fort Worth ECUSA diocese, presumably about reception into Orthodoxy.
I'm a huge fan of the Anglicans. Their sensible outreach spirit has brought us such varied phenomena as the USA (Anglicans along with Protestants, Masons, and Deists) and Alcoholics Anonymous.
How shameful we Orthodox must feel at our own paltry outreach. Our excitable Greek and Slavic energies have been wasted in stupid quibblings. We can't even agree to pay our priests a living wage. We make a big show about Lenten repentance and what the Fathers think about whatnot, but kick the man who's commissioned to lead us to the Kingdom. We kick his family, too.
Met. Jonah's talks with the Anglicans are good news. Assuming there's some real conversion going on, the Met needs to get his numbers up to take on the Greeks about leadership in America. He needs also to show Moscow that he has the Right Stuff to lead a united Russian-legacy effort.
All of these issues are nice, but I'm especially joyful at the prospect of more formerly-Anglican converts filling Orthodox parish councils. The Anglicans are used to having priests, and they're used to paying them well. In fact, I would say that in my experience Anglican converts are the only converts that parishes should fight to get on their councils. Among the cradles on councils, my favorites are Syrians and Greeks, in that order. Those cradles are also worth fighting for.
We enter the Kingdom through our parishes. Let's take care of them.
I'm a huge fan of the Anglicans. Their sensible outreach spirit has brought us such varied phenomena as the USA (Anglicans along with Protestants, Masons, and Deists) and Alcoholics Anonymous.
How shameful we Orthodox must feel at our own paltry outreach. Our excitable Greek and Slavic energies have been wasted in stupid quibblings. We can't even agree to pay our priests a living wage. We make a big show about Lenten repentance and what the Fathers think about whatnot, but kick the man who's commissioned to lead us to the Kingdom. We kick his family, too.
Met. Jonah's talks with the Anglicans are good news. Assuming there's some real conversion going on, the Met needs to get his numbers up to take on the Greeks about leadership in America. He needs also to show Moscow that he has the Right Stuff to lead a united Russian-legacy effort.
All of these issues are nice, but I'm especially joyful at the prospect of more formerly-Anglican converts filling Orthodox parish councils. The Anglicans are used to having priests, and they're used to paying them well. In fact, I would say that in my experience Anglican converts are the only converts that parishes should fight to get on their councils. Among the cradles on councils, my favorites are Syrians and Greeks, in that order. Those cradles are also worth fighting for.
We enter the Kingdom through our parishes. Let's take care of them.
Thursday, February 18, 2010
"You're An Historicist" AKA "Your Momma"
In philosophical circles, calling someone an historicist is like talking trash about someone's mother. It doesn't accomplish much, but it could rock a pretty lazy day.
Unless, of course, one's actually talking about a priori truth, which in this day and age is pretty rare.
Have you met an extreme apriorist lately? You have now, but I'll save the Austrian Methodenstreit topic for another time.
I visited Och's tea party after a six-month absence when friend Sophocles asked me to sound off on something. Unfortunately, Och's daily topic didn't permit my periodic anti-ecumenist diatribe, but it was almost as interesting:
USURY
I'm still trying to figure out what Och means by usury, because he describes all sorts of things as usurious, but I know it means something BAD.
To me, usury means:
ZIP. ZERO. NOTHING. NADA.
The East and West diverged in their treatment of interest on loans.
We all know how things went in the West: (1) Interest was outlawed, thanks to Aristotle and his episcopal cheerleaders and (2) Cardinal Cajetan saved Westerners from Aristotle's error. Deo Gratias.
How did things go in the East? Byzantium and Russia didn't outlaw interest. Their cultures were commercial. The West's was agrarian. The Fathers--the Real Ones--concerned themselves with loans and interest being charged to the destitute. Plainly put, it's uncharitable for someone to charge interest to a distressed borrower. Unpaid interest compounds over time and magnifies the distress of the already-distressed borrower. It's simple decency not to charge interest, and it's meritorious to forgive the principal as well.
Let's add another dimension--the penalty for nonpayment of debt. Back in the Fathers' time, failing to pays debts could land one and one's family and heirs in prison or slavery. When the Fathers talk about interest and enslavement, they mean it. It's not metaphorical.
Charging compounding interest to a distressed borrower heightens the probability that the borrower won't die as a free man.
You can call it usury. I call it evil.
In our casually-clothed age, however, debt enslavement is metaphorical. The borrower's downside is truncated by bankruptcy. Unpleasant, but one remains free. One can even pick a preferred chapter of the Bankruptcy Code.
When the Fathers talk about usury, it's good for us to know what they mean. All ya'll gotta look at the words, but what do the words mean?.
Sometimes meaning can be gleaned by the cultural and historical context that shaped their concepts and language. Sometimes context is an excuse for historicism.
By the way, Mom's fine. Thanks for asking.
Unless, of course, one's actually talking about a priori truth, which in this day and age is pretty rare.
Have you met an extreme apriorist lately? You have now, but I'll save the Austrian Methodenstreit topic for another time.
I visited Och's tea party after a six-month absence when friend Sophocles asked me to sound off on something. Unfortunately, Och's daily topic didn't permit my periodic anti-ecumenist diatribe, but it was almost as interesting:
USURY
I'm still trying to figure out what Och means by usury, because he describes all sorts of things as usurious, but I know it means something BAD.
To me, usury means:
ZIP. ZERO. NOTHING. NADA.
The East and West diverged in their treatment of interest on loans.
We all know how things went in the West: (1) Interest was outlawed, thanks to Aristotle and his episcopal cheerleaders and (2) Cardinal Cajetan saved Westerners from Aristotle's error. Deo Gratias.
How did things go in the East? Byzantium and Russia didn't outlaw interest. Their cultures were commercial. The West's was agrarian. The Fathers--the Real Ones--concerned themselves with loans and interest being charged to the destitute. Plainly put, it's uncharitable for someone to charge interest to a distressed borrower. Unpaid interest compounds over time and magnifies the distress of the already-distressed borrower. It's simple decency not to charge interest, and it's meritorious to forgive the principal as well.
Let's add another dimension--the penalty for nonpayment of debt. Back in the Fathers' time, failing to pays debts could land one and one's family and heirs in prison or slavery. When the Fathers talk about interest and enslavement, they mean it. It's not metaphorical.
Charging compounding interest to a distressed borrower heightens the probability that the borrower won't die as a free man.
You can call it usury. I call it evil.
In our casually-clothed age, however, debt enslavement is metaphorical. The borrower's downside is truncated by bankruptcy. Unpleasant, but one remains free. One can even pick a preferred chapter of the Bankruptcy Code.
When the Fathers talk about usury, it's good for us to know what they mean. All ya'll gotta look at the words, but what do the words mean?.
Sometimes meaning can be gleaned by the cultural and historical context that shaped their concepts and language. Sometimes context is an excuse for historicism.
By the way, Mom's fine. Thanks for asking.
Never Underestimate The Power Of A Tired Banality To Attract The Banal
Pass the Pepto
Give to the IOCC, and skip the self-absorbed display of charity.
"We are the fallen world, and
you should listen to our song
rather than attend the Canon.
We need you more than St. Andrew, anyway.
Have a great day!"
Give to the IOCC, and skip the self-absorbed display of charity.
"We are the fallen world, and
you should listen to our song
rather than attend the Canon.
We need you more than St. Andrew, anyway.
Have a great day!"
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Health Care
'Tis the season for health care pontification. Bowing to popular demand, I'll state my position, or, rather, reiterate Ron Paul's position. Paul's Comprehensive Health Care Reform Act:
Paul's Coercion is Not Health Care Act:
This legislation forbids the federal government from forcing any American to purchase health insurance, and from conditioning participation in any federal program, or receipt of any federal benefit, on the purchase of health insurance.
A. Provides all Americans with a tax credit for 100 percent of health care expenses. The tax credit is fully refundable against both income and payroll taxes.
B. Allows individuals to roll over unused amounts in cafeteria plans and Flexible Savings Accounts (FSA).
C. Makes every American eligible for a Health Savings Account (HSA), removes the requirement that individuals must obtain a high-deductible insurance policy to open an HSA; allows individuals to use their HSA to make premiums payments for high-deductible policy; and allows senior citizens to use their HSA to purchase Medigap policies.
D. Repeals the 7.5 percent threshold for the deduction of medical expenses, thus making all medical expenses tax deductible.
Paul's Coercion is Not Health Care Act:
This legislation forbids the federal government from forcing any American to purchase health insurance, and from conditioning participation in any federal program, or receipt of any federal benefit, on the purchase of health insurance.
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Patriarch Kyrill On Veliky Novgorod
Patriarch Kyrill celebrated the birth of Veliky Novgorod in 859 by speaking about its republican history. Russian political history isn't monolithically absolutist.
Tuesday, September 01, 2009
Friday, August 28, 2009
Charpentier's Prelude (Te Deum)
Arturo inspired this post.
The sound quality is muddled, but the tempo is appropriately snappy.
I've run across this more conventional rendition at Western weddings.
The sound quality is muddled, but the tempo is appropriately snappy.
I've run across this more conventional rendition at Western weddings.
Multi-Tasking As A Divine Attribute
Do you ever become impatient with incompetent folks who swear that they can successfully multi-task? I do.
Let me go further by proposing that anyone who claims to be a successful multi-tasker is automatically incompetent. Scientists have concluded that we humans can focus only on one task at at time. Therefore, performing more than one task simultaneously consists in applying "continuous partial attention" to the tasks. (I got that phrase from today's Wall Street Journal.)
I'm going to add this to my list of interview questions: Can you successfully multi-task, and can you give me an example of your success at multi-tasking?
Just imagine how the interviewees, eager to make a good impression, would fall into my trap. Not only are they incapable of focusing, but also they're incapable of acquiring the introspective knowledge that would enable them to recognize what focusing entails and how they fall short.
Or, I could just dismiss them as blasphemers for claiming possession of what appears to be a divine attribute.
Let me go further by proposing that anyone who claims to be a successful multi-tasker is automatically incompetent. Scientists have concluded that we humans can focus only on one task at at time. Therefore, performing more than one task simultaneously consists in applying "continuous partial attention" to the tasks. (I got that phrase from today's Wall Street Journal.)
I'm going to add this to my list of interview questions: Can you successfully multi-task, and can you give me an example of your success at multi-tasking?
Just imagine how the interviewees, eager to make a good impression, would fall into my trap. Not only are they incapable of focusing, but also they're incapable of acquiring the introspective knowledge that would enable them to recognize what focusing entails and how they fall short.
Or, I could just dismiss them as blasphemers for claiming possession of what appears to be a divine attribute.
Empirical Economic Irony
Gabriel and I have been conversing about Austrian economics, and we've been particularly focused on the School's theoretical wertfreiheit as opposed to its identification with libertarian normative prescriptions. Gabriel noted that perhaps the Austrians have been so closely identified with libertarianism that any attempt to distinguish Austrianism from libertarianism would be futile.
That kind of concern has never favorably impressed me, and I remain convinced of the crucial distinctions between theory, application, and statecraft. For those who are new to the discussion, what I call application consists in applying economic theory to the empirical world of history, forecasting, and finance.
I spent a little time today listening to a presentation from a Chicago School economist about monetary policy. My takeaway was that he, Ben Bernanke, and I have roughly the same ideas about how the Fed should have conducted its business during Fall 2008's dire days and how the Fed should conduct its business presently.
Now, this correlation would be apostasy among the Austrian purists with whom I associate, and I'd have to defend my empirical applications as vehemently against those Austrians--and I know this from experience--as I'd have to defend Austrian theoretical apriorism and methodological individualism against the Chicagoans.
Let's just say that God's expansive sense of humor manifests itself by His throwing all sorts of cute ironies and paradoxes in my path.
That kind of concern has never favorably impressed me, and I remain convinced of the crucial distinctions between theory, application, and statecraft. For those who are new to the discussion, what I call application consists in applying economic theory to the empirical world of history, forecasting, and finance.
I spent a little time today listening to a presentation from a Chicago School economist about monetary policy. My takeaway was that he, Ben Bernanke, and I have roughly the same ideas about how the Fed should have conducted its business during Fall 2008's dire days and how the Fed should conduct its business presently.
Now, this correlation would be apostasy among the Austrian purists with whom I associate, and I'd have to defend my empirical applications as vehemently against those Austrians--and I know this from experience--as I'd have to defend Austrian theoretical apriorism and methodological individualism against the Chicagoans.
Let's just say that God's expansive sense of humor manifests itself by His throwing all sorts of cute ironies and paradoxes in my path.
Friday, August 14, 2009
Monetary Economics 101
The Russian Church Primate again called the crisis a consequence of 'sin that penetrated in modern economics,' and stated that today, 'people of honest labor pay for those who made millions and milliards [sic] out of air, pay for deception, for those who seeking easy profits lost human face in economic relations.' [Emphasis mine]
Alan Greenspan's easy monetary policy manufactured money out of thin air. The newly-created money stole value from previously-existing money. This is the shameful mechanism of monetary inflation. Patriarch Kyrill is right on the money.
Alan Greenspan's easy monetary policy manufactured money out of thin air. The newly-created money stole value from previously-existing money. This is the shameful mechanism of monetary inflation. Patriarch Kyrill is right on the money.
Busybodies Want To Cheapen The Wedding Garments
Reporters criticized Patriarch Kyrill's expensive watch here. Maybe we're supposed to think that Christ stole from the poor by creating precious metals and other luxuries.
We Knew All Along That You Were Just A Pretty Face...
...and we wanted some real foreign policy expertise.
I can't stop laughing at this one.
I can't stop laughing at this one.
Friday, July 24, 2009
If You Don't Like This One, You're Not Human
It speaks for itself. I'm the proud owner of the CD. Crank up the volume so you don't miss the beginning.
Liking It Is Sufficient Reason For Posting It
Wrong season, but I like this nonliturgical hymn. The first rendition is so beautiful it's scary.
The second rendition isn't the best, but I adore their enthusiasm. If you observe the conductor, you'll notice that the enthusiasm is being orchestrated.
Now you know how I spend my free time.
The second rendition isn't the best, but I adore their enthusiasm. If you observe the conductor, you'll notice that the enthusiasm is being orchestrated.
Now you know how I spend my free time.
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Stress Management Without Yoga
"Gentleness and humidity is the greatest power that not only helps manage the world according to God's law, but helps a person find peace and health."
Patriarch Kyrill
Patriarch Kyrill
Wednesday, July 08, 2009
Whew! Western Rite Revisited
I'm back from the Apostles' Fast. My abstention from blogging during the Church's fasts extends to an abstention from reading blogs as well. I cherished my time away from controversy, and maybe I'll be wiser this time around.
Och has been hitting the Antiochian issues pretty hard, and I'm not very well-informed about those issues. I don't like commenting on things about which I know little, generally speaking, and therefore I commented sizably about Antioch's Western Rite project. Maybe I don't know anything about that one, either, but I couldn't refrain from a minor swipe at Antioch's "we take all kinds of folks" adventurousness.
I'm more confident in the ROCOR's nurturing of a WR that doesn't contradict the mind of the Church than the Antiochians. Let's not kid ourselves. Antioch is willing to set all kinds of precedents that other jurisdictions would rather avoid. The absorption of the Campus Crusade for Christ evangelicals is another example of Antioch's daring.
My own misgivings about the WR pertain to the liturgy, not to the Orthodox theological propositions to which WRiters adhere. Orthodox theology is experiential, and the formal propositions come afterward. My concern is whether the WR experience contradicts Orthodoxy, and, in my mind, while that doubt persists, the ROCOR serves as a more reliable mother hen than Antioch.
Now, some half-clever lad may trot out the old canard that the WR existed during the first millennium and that the WR's Orthodoxy is established merely by that prior existence. There are all sorts of problems with a liturgy that has evolved and matured within a heretical context, irrespective of a "spotless" origin within a Patriarchate that showed clear tendencies toward heterodox divergence. Certainly, the Eastern Patriarchates were rife with heresies at times, but, at the end of the day, the East overcame those heresies, and didn't abandon the Faith. The West folded.
Please excuse my lack of empathy regarding the WR as an entry point for converts. At the risk of agreeing too much with Och, let me say that I am sick and tired of attempts to market the Church to enquirers who are squeamish about worshipping in an Orthodox manner and within an integrated Orthodox context. No one disputes that Orthodoxy is acted out in a noncontradictory manner in the Eastern liturgy. So why do we have to change anything for anyone? We need to make sure that the WR is safe for human consumption before we pander to adolescent whiners who take their Christ with a grain of salt.
Do you really think I'm being too harsh? Okay, let's take a look at Met. Jonah's outright overture to continuing Anglicans. He didn't say anything that Moscow hasn't been saying for a century or two, and he was correct in at least extending his hand. With a few exceptions, however, he may as well have been talking to himself. For all of their bluster about adding "reason" to Rome's duopoly of Scripture and tradition, those Anglican dudes can't even bring themselves to take the small baby step of excising the Romish filioque from their creed. They've become comfortable in their ossified heterodoxy, and this theological sloth is the context from which enquirers emigrate to jump into an ill-advised WR. I'd be very comfortable with turning over the WR project in its entirety to ROCOR's careful supervision.
Och has been hitting the Antiochian issues pretty hard, and I'm not very well-informed about those issues. I don't like commenting on things about which I know little, generally speaking, and therefore I commented sizably about Antioch's Western Rite project. Maybe I don't know anything about that one, either, but I couldn't refrain from a minor swipe at Antioch's "we take all kinds of folks" adventurousness.
I'm more confident in the ROCOR's nurturing of a WR that doesn't contradict the mind of the Church than the Antiochians. Let's not kid ourselves. Antioch is willing to set all kinds of precedents that other jurisdictions would rather avoid. The absorption of the Campus Crusade for Christ evangelicals is another example of Antioch's daring.
My own misgivings about the WR pertain to the liturgy, not to the Orthodox theological propositions to which WRiters adhere. Orthodox theology is experiential, and the formal propositions come afterward. My concern is whether the WR experience contradicts Orthodoxy, and, in my mind, while that doubt persists, the ROCOR serves as a more reliable mother hen than Antioch.
Now, some half-clever lad may trot out the old canard that the WR existed during the first millennium and that the WR's Orthodoxy is established merely by that prior existence. There are all sorts of problems with a liturgy that has evolved and matured within a heretical context, irrespective of a "spotless" origin within a Patriarchate that showed clear tendencies toward heterodox divergence. Certainly, the Eastern Patriarchates were rife with heresies at times, but, at the end of the day, the East overcame those heresies, and didn't abandon the Faith. The West folded.
Please excuse my lack of empathy regarding the WR as an entry point for converts. At the risk of agreeing too much with Och, let me say that I am sick and tired of attempts to market the Church to enquirers who are squeamish about worshipping in an Orthodox manner and within an integrated Orthodox context. No one disputes that Orthodoxy is acted out in a noncontradictory manner in the Eastern liturgy. So why do we have to change anything for anyone? We need to make sure that the WR is safe for human consumption before we pander to adolescent whiners who take their Christ with a grain of salt.
Do you really think I'm being too harsh? Okay, let's take a look at Met. Jonah's outright overture to continuing Anglicans. He didn't say anything that Moscow hasn't been saying for a century or two, and he was correct in at least extending his hand. With a few exceptions, however, he may as well have been talking to himself. For all of their bluster about adding "reason" to Rome's duopoly of Scripture and tradition, those Anglican dudes can't even bring themselves to take the small baby step of excising the Romish filioque from their creed. They've become comfortable in their ossified heterodoxy, and this theological sloth is the context from which enquirers emigrate to jump into an ill-advised WR. I'd be very comfortable with turning over the WR project in its entirety to ROCOR's careful supervision.
Wednesday, June 03, 2009
Good Pick From Naxos
I like buying Naxos CDs because they're inexpensive. Unfortunately, they're often cheap. Today, I had the pleasure of listening to the Novospassky Monastery Choir's Russian Divine Liturgy (in Slavonic). The CD was inexpensive, but not cheap.
It Needed To Be Said
I commented on the Wall Street Journal's blog, Mean Street. The poster posited that Hank Paulson should be declared a national hero owing to his creation of the TARP program. I agreed:
Clearly, TARP was needed to prevent an imminent systemic banking collapse, and Hank Paulson and Ben Bernanke are the heros. You’re right on the mark about these particular saviors. Systemic risk means that we end up living in caves.
TALF is the proximate driver of reliquification, but it couldn’t have happened without TARP.
As an Austro-Libertarian, I hate government involvement in anything, since government is inherently anti-consumer, but TARP was needed to patch things together during the unwinding of Greenspan’s debt orgy.
Yes, Paulson is a hero, but Bernanke joins him in that particular Hall of Fame. Bernanke lent the TARP program the intellectual weight that it needed to get folks like me to endorse the plan. Paulson isn't a dummy, but his understandable incentive to defecate on Goldman's competitors would have colored my view of the TARP program had he been its sole sponsor.
Clearly, TARP was needed to prevent an imminent systemic banking collapse, and Hank Paulson and Ben Bernanke are the heros. You’re right on the mark about these particular saviors. Systemic risk means that we end up living in caves.
TALF is the proximate driver of reliquification, but it couldn’t have happened without TARP.
As an Austro-Libertarian, I hate government involvement in anything, since government is inherently anti-consumer, but TARP was needed to patch things together during the unwinding of Greenspan’s debt orgy.
Yes, Paulson is a hero, but Bernanke joins him in that particular Hall of Fame. Bernanke lent the TARP program the intellectual weight that it needed to get folks like me to endorse the plan. Paulson isn't a dummy, but his understandable incentive to defecate on Goldman's competitors would have colored my view of the TARP program had he been its sole sponsor.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


